Question? Call us at 800-207-8001 | Sign In | Learn About Membership

Wednesday, June 19, 2013 | Last Updated: January 11, 2013 10:22 AM

Transportation Experts Blog
«Shallow Agreement | Main page | Conservatives: Senate Bill Is 'Crap Sandwich'»

Time to Hit the Gas

By Fawn Johnson
Correspondent, National Journal
March 12, 2012 | 8:30 a.m.
  • 3

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa was in town last week, lobbying as he has been for the last several months for lawmakers to get it together and pass a surface transportation bill. Villaraigosa has a specific reason for his tenacious advocacy, and it's not just that he works closely with the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. If Congress passes the $109 billion measure currently being debated in the Senate, Los Angeles would be able to accelerate as many as 12 local transportation projects.

Villaraigosa is championing a specific provision in the Senate bill that would give the Transportation Department expanded abilities to extend credit to local municipalities for "mega public transportation projects." It is part of Villaraigosa's America Fast Forward plan, which he says would create one million jobs in the construction and technical industries and generate $158 billion in total economic output.

Villaraigosa has some great ideas on project acceleration that have been echoed by the likes of President Obama and House Transportation Committee Chairman John Mica, R-Fla. It is one of the major benefits to come if Congress actually passes a transportation bill this year. America Fast Forward focuses on public transit, which is not always at the top of rural lawmakers' priority list. But other than that, it's an idea most people like.

Is Villaraigosa right that simple financing fixes could speed up so many transit projects? Would the credit extensions in the Senate bill help other localities besides Los Angeles, including rural ones? Is it appropriate to focus so much attention on public transportation? What is holding up most transportation projects?

3 Responses

Expand all comments Collapse all comments

March 15, 2012 10:44 AM

Guest: Leverage Limited Federal Dollars

By Fawn Johnson

Correspondent, National Journal

Here is a guest response from Linda Bohlinger, Director of National Management Consulting for
HNTB Corporation:

Adequate funding begins with effectively leveraging the limited federal dollars that will be available moving forward.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa should be commended for supporting the expansion of the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program as part of his America Fast Forward initiative. His admirable vision for completing 30 years’ worth of LA Metro transit projects in the next 10 years most likely will need to rely on support from TIFIA.

Without TIFIA, some of the most significant transportation projects of the last 14 years would have been delayed or deferred due to their size, complexity or uncertainty over the timing of forecasted revenues. According to the Federal Highway Administration, which handles the program, each dollar of federal ...

Here is a guest response from Linda Bohlinger, Director of National Management Consulting for
HNTB Corporation
:

Adequate funding begins with effectively leveraging the limited federal dollars that will be available moving forward.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa should be commended for supporting the expansion of the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program as part of his America Fast Forward initiative. His admirable vision for completing 30 years’ worth of LA Metro transit projects in the next 10 years most likely will need to rely on support from TIFIA.

Without TIFIA, some of the most significant transportation projects of the last 14 years would have been delayed or deferred due to their size, complexity or uncertainty over the timing of forecasted revenues. According to the Federal Highway Administration, which handles the program, each dollar of federal funds can provide up to $10 in TIFIA credit assistance, and leverage $30 of overall investment in transportation infrastructure.

Expanding this popular federal credit assistance program – increasing the program to $1 billion annually, as both the House and Senate have proposed – will trigger $10 billion in loans each year. Streamlining the program’s administration also will allow more money to flow to more projects more quickly, driving job creation and economic development. For example, LA Metro has advocated for allowing a master credit agreement with TIFIA to secure loan commitments on a number of related projects at one time.

Another reason Mayor Villaraigosa’s proposal is so commendable is its regionalized vision for the future. It’s something we’ve been missing for a while.

The Greater Los Angeles region – and our entire country – is dependent on a healthy transportation system for its long-term economic competitiveness and the viability of its quality of life. Without transit, the system isn’t whole and cannot offer mobility choices for the public.

Public transportation is vital to the success of any modern multimodal transportation system. Southern California has taken major steps toward breaking free of its car-crazed culture. More work, a solid unified commitment of leadership and strong messaging for greater acceptance of multiple modes of public transportation is ongoing and needed.

Leveraging investment dollars for transportation projects will create jobs and encourage sustainable economic development. Big picture thinking to understand choices and consequences will lead us to a productive, prosperous and sustainable future for transit.

For more about transit in Southern California, read HNTB’s THINK: Infrastructure Forum transcript.

Read More

Print |
Share | E-mail

March 15, 2012 9:43 AM

But need Congress fund public transport?

By Gabriel Roth

Research Fellow, The Independent Institute

Mayor Villaraigosa is wise to seek transit money in Washington, because his own voters would never pay for his “mega public transportation” projects. But in Washington he can find support from community organizers such as Laura Barrett who are expert at persuading members of congress to appropriate money they do not have for projects that customers do not want to pay for.

“Is it appropriate to focus so much attention on public transportation”? Yes, as that is where the lobbying money is. And as building rail is so much more profitable than building roads, most of the lobbying is for rail.

Does that mean that only bankrupt governments, urged on by lobbyists, can finance public transport? In the USA this may well be so, as most urban areas prohibit public transport by shared taxis or associations of minibus-owners that can offer unsubsidized, high-frequency, seated services. Such services are common worldwide and some are to be found even in the US, e.g. in Atlantic City (legally) and in New York City (illegally).

If legalized and regulated for safety they could meet most transit needs.

Print |
Share | E-mail

March 13, 2012 11:03 AM

Appetite for Transit

By Laura Barrett

It's certainly noteworthy that ambitious, forward-thinking mayors are turning to transit as one of the best community-building mechanisms available. Apparently, winds of change are blowing in the USDOT as well. Administrator Rogoff of the Federal Transit Authority told the Transportation Equity Network's annual conference last week that he is working to increase the number of new bus rapid transit and light rail projects that FTA supports. He wants to support both transit-dependent riders and choice riders. When we as a nation invest in TIGER grants or the Sustainable Communities program, we're helping to create transit, jobs, and sustainable communities - goals we can all get behind.

In the meantime, riders are voting with their feet. According to the APTA study that was released today, 10.4 billion trips were taken on US public transit in 2011. This is the secon...

It's certainly noteworthy that ambitious, forward-thinking mayors are turning to transit as one of the best community-building mechanisms available. Apparently, winds of change are blowing in the USDOT as well. Administrator Rogoff of the Federal Transit Authority told the Transportation Equity Network's annual conference last week that he is working to increase the number of new bus rapid transit and light rail projects that FTA supports. He wants to support both transit-dependent riders and choice riders. When we as a nation invest in TIGER grants or the Sustainable Communities program, we're helping to create transit, jobs, and sustainable communities - goals we can all get behind.

In the meantime, riders are voting with their feet. According to the APTA study that was released today, 10.4 billion trips were taken on US public transit in 2011. This is the second highest annual ridership since 1957. Americans are choosing to take transit, even in cities that don't experience daunting traffic. In my hometown of St. Louis, light rail ridership increased by 10% over the last year. Surprisingly, rural communities experienced the biggest jump - in cities under 100,000, transit ridership increased by 5.4% according to ATPA.

When transit systems and other infrastructure projects are created, we need to ensure that any public-private partnership is accountable to the taxpayer. Senator Durbin and others are working to make public-private partnerships more transparent. It's a part of the equation that we just can't ignore. As the USPIRG points out, lax oversight could lead us down the road to another Enron.

Read More

Print |
Share | E-mail

Leave a response

 

Archives
  • June 2013
    • Hands-Free Won't Cut It
    • It's an East Coast Thing
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008

 

Blogroll
  • Airport Check-In
  • AOPA Now
  • The Avenue
  • DC Streets Blog
  • Evan Sparks' Aviation Policy Blog
  • Fast Lane
  • Freight Public Policy & Sustainability Blog
  • Infra Insight
  • The Infrastructurist
  • MTS Matters
  • New American City
  • NewGeography
  • NRDC's Switchboard, Deron Lovaas
  • NRDC's Switchboard, Colin Peppard
  • Oh the Places You'll Go
  • Planetizen
  • RTC Blog
  • StreetSense
  • Swelblog
  • Tolling Points
  • Transportation Equity Network blog
  • The TransportPolitic
  • Trucking Matters
  • Washington State DOT’s Federal Transportation Issues blog
  • Young Professionals in Transportation Blog

 

The “agree” function has been temporarily disabled from the blog while we transition to a new system. The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.

NationalJournal Magazine | NationalJournal Daily | Hotline | Almanac | NationalJournal Live
About | Contact Us | Press Room | Staff Bios | Jobs | Reprints & Back Issues | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Atlantic Media Company | Government Executive | The Atlantic | Quartz
Copyright © 2013 by National Journal Group Inc.
Powered by the Parse.ly Publisher Platform (P3).